For roughly twenty years John W. Loftus used to be a religious evangelical Christian, an ordained minister of the Church of Christ, and an ardent apologist for Christianity. With 3 degrees--in philosophy, theology, and philosophy of religion--he was once adept at utilizing rational argumentation to protect the religion. yet through the years, doubts in regards to the credibility of key Christian tenets started to creep into his considering. by way of the past due Nineties he skilled a full-blown predicament of religion.

In this sincere appraisal of his trip from believer to atheist, the writer rigorously explains the reviews and the reasoning approach that led him to reject non secular trust. the unique variation of this e-book used to be released in 2006 and reissued in 2008. due to the fact that that point, Loftus has acquired a great deal of severe suggestions from Christians and skeptics alike. during this revised and increased variation, the writer addresses criticisms of the unique, provides new argumentation and references, and refines his presentation. for each factor he succinctly summarizes a number of the issues of view and gives references for extra studying. In end, he describes the results of lifestyles with no trust in God, a few releasing, a few sobering.

This frank critique of Christian trust from a former insider will curiosity freethinkers in addition to a person with doubts concerning the claims of faith.

Show description

Preview of Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity (Revised & Expanded) PDF

Best Christianity books

God's Secret Agents: Queen Elizabeth's Forbidden Priests and the Hatching of the Gunpowder Plot

One night in 1588, simply weeks after the defeat of the Spanish Armada, younger males landed in mystery on a seashore in Norfolk, England. They have been Jesuit clergymen, Englishmen, and their objective used to be to accomplish by way of strength of argument what the Armada had didn't do by means of strength of hands: go back England to the Catholic Church.

The Problem of Pain

Within the challenge of discomfort, C. S. Lewis, some of the most popular Christian authors and thinkers, examines a universally appropriate query in the human : “If God is nice and omnipotent, why does he permit his creatures to undergo soreness? ” along with his signature wealth of compassion and perception, C.

Revelations of Divine Love (Short Text and Long Text)

One of many first lady authors, Julian of Norwich produced in Revelations of Divine Love a outstanding paintings of revelatory perception, that stands along The Cloud of Unknowing and Piers Plowman as a vintage of Medieval non secular literatureAfter fervently praying for a better knowing of Christ's ardour, Julian of Norwich, a fourteenth-century anchorite and mystic, skilled a chain of divine revelations.

The Future of the Catholic Church with Pope Francis

The New York Times–bestselling historian takes on a urgent query in smooth faith: Will Pope Francis include switch?   Pope Francis, the 1st Jesuit pope and the 1st from the Americas, deals a problem to his church. Can he result in major swap? may still he?    Garry Wills, the Pulitzer Prize–winning historian, argues provocatively that, in truth, the historical past of the church all through is a background of switch.

Additional resources for Why I Became an Atheist: A Former Preacher Rejects Christianity (Revised & Expanded)

Show sample text content

Positioned me out of life now. ” that may be the average factor to do. just a idiot would select differently, given the terrible descriptions of hell and the chances of finishing up there. If not anything else, God may still already understand what the percentages are and never pick out that probability for us. And but right here i'm, with none selection within the subject, it appears condemned to hell. this can be my lifestyles. i might have desired to make that call myself. five. AN IRRATIONAL bounce of religion past THE proof In his booklet Concluding Unscientific Postscript, existentialist thinker Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) argued that goal inquiry is completely irrelevant in non secular issues. after we procedure a query objectively, we deal with the reality as an item, while if we strategy a question subjectively, we deal with the reality as an issue to which the knower is expounded. On which aspect is the reality to be came across, he rhetorically asks. the target option to pursue fact rests upon the approximation method, Kierkegaard argued. For Kierkegaard, ancient proof is just approximate. So he argued we can't base our everlasting happiness on any approximation of the reality because it won't ever produce the endless own curiosity demanded through non secular religion. an enormous own curiosity makes attainable the best conceivable sacrifices at the smallest probability of good fortune. religion for Kierkegaard needs to be decisive. trust excludes doubt as the end of trust is a resolution—a selection. this sort of religion calls for a “leap” past the facts, a jump that can't be justified by means of aim reasoning. “Without chance there isn't any religion. ” in addition, one can't have an actual religion with out being absolutely devoted to it. On which aspect is the reality? Who has the higher simple task? Who has the higher religion? one that passionately takes a better threat in accordance with little proof, or one that appears to be like into the problem objectively? a short review of Kierkegaard whatever is to be stated for taking dangers and the dedication involved—it is admirable, as when it comes to the dependable patriot, or a pal who believes we're blameless while the proof indicates we're accountable. yet what approximately lost dedication and loyalty? “Given that religion is a bounce, how does one make a decision which religion to ‘jump for'? …What might we make of a non secular one that flippantly informs us that she is definitely conscious that a few of her ideals are logically contradictory, or they clash with famous evidence, but she reveals this no problem to maintaining those ideals? ”53 Robert Merrihew Adams asks the an important query of “whether the maximization of sacrifice and threat are so important in faith as to make aim improbability a fascinating attribute of non secular ideals. ”54 J. L. Mackie claims that Kierkegaard “seems to be arguing from a place, to not a place. ” Mackie asks no matter if Kierkegaard thinks the one form of dedication necessary of the identify is person who accepts a paradoxical trust without aim purposes in its want. accordingly, he argues, Kierkegaard advocates “a type of highbrow Russian roulette.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.52 of 5 – based on 39 votes