By Zeeya Merali

The essays during this publication examine approach during which the fundaments of physics may wish to be replaced with a view to make development in the direction of a unified concept. they're in response to the prize-winning essays submitted to the FQXi essay festival “Which of Our easy actual Assumptions Are Wrong?”, which drew over 270 entries.

As Nobel Laureate physicist Philip W. Anderson discovered, the most important to figuring out nature’s fact isn't really whatever “magical”, however the correct perspective, “the specialise in asking the appropriate questions, the willingness to aim (and to discard) unconventional solutions, the delicate ear for phoniness, self-deception, bombast, and traditional yet unproven assumptions.”

The authors of the eighteen prize-winning essays have, the place valuable, tailored their essays for the current quantity to be able to (a) contain the group suggestions generated within the on-line dialogue of the essays, (b) upload new fabric that has come to gentle considering their finishing touch and (c) to make sure accessibility to a wide viewers of readers with a easy grounding in physics.

The Foundational Questions Institute, FQXi, catalyzes, helps, and disseminates learn on questions on the foundations of physics and cosmology, fairly new frontiers and cutting edge principles critical to a deep knowing of truth, yet not likely to be supported by means of traditional investment sources.

Show description

Quick preview of Questioning the Foundations of Physics: Which of Our Fundamental Assumptions Are Wrong? (The Frontiers Collection) PDF

Best Physics books

Six Ideas That Shaped Physics: Unit C - Conservation Laws Constrain Interactions (2nd Edition)

ISBN: 0072291524
Author: Thomas Moore
Pages: 308 in PDF
Publisher: McGraw-Hill schooling; 2 edition
Date: June four, 2002

SIX principles THAT formed PHYSICS is the twenty first Century's substitute to conventional, encyclopedic textbooks. Thomas Moore designed SIX rules to coach scholars: --to observe uncomplicated actual ideas to real looking occasions --to resolve lifelike difficulties --to get to the bottom of contradictions among their preconceptions and the legislation of physics --to set up the information of physics into an built-in hierarchy

Light and Video Microscopy

The aim of this ebook is to supply the main finished, easy-to-use, and informative advisor on mild microscopy. mild and Video Microscopy will organize the reader for the exact interpretation of a picture and knowing of the residing cellphone. With the presentation of geometrical optics, it's going to support the reader in figuring out snapshot formation and lightweight move in the microscope.

Quantum Mechanics: An Empiricist View (Clarendon Paperbacks)

After introducing the empiricist viewpoint in philosophy of technological know-how, and the techniques and techniques of the semantic method of medical theories, van Fraassen discusses quantum thought in 3 levels. He first examines the query of even if and the way empirical phenomena require a non-classical thought, and how much idea they require.

A Student's Guide to Einstein's Major Papers

Our knowing of the actual universe underwent a revolution within the early 20th century - evolving from the classical physics of Newton, Galileo, and Maxwell to the trendy physics of relativity and quantum mechanics. The dominant determine during this progressive switch used to be Albert Einstein. in one yr, 1905, Einstein produced step forward works in 3 components of physics: at the dimension and the results of atoms; at the quantization of the electromagnetic box; and at the precise conception of relativity.

Extra resources for Questioning the Foundations of Physics: Which of Our Fundamental Assumptions Are Wrong? (The Frontiers Collection)

Show sample text content

Rev. Mod. Phys. 61(1), 1–23 (1989)CrossRefADSMATH forty eight. A. H. Guth, Inflationary universe: a potential technique to the horizon and flatness difficulties. Phys. Rev. D 23(2), 347–356 (1981)CrossRefADS forty nine. C. P. Burgess, The cosmological consistent challenge: why it’s demanding to get darkish strength from micro-physics (2013), ArXiv:​ 1309. 4133 [hep-th] 50. BICEP2 Collaboration (Ade, P. A. R. , et al. ): Planck 2013 effects. XVI. Cosmological parameters (2013), ArXiv:​1303. 5076 [astro-ph. CO] fifty one. L. P. Grishchuck, Amplification of gravitational waves in an isotropic universe. Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. sixty seven, 825–838 (1974)ADS fifty two. A. A. Starobinsky, Spectrum of relict gravitational radiation and the early nation of the universe. JETP Lett. 30, 682–685 (1979)ADS fifty three. V. A. Rubakov, M. V. Sazhin, A. V. Veryaskin, Graviton construction within the inflationary universe and the grand unification scale. Phys. Lett. 115B(3), 189–192 (1982)CrossRefADS fifty four. T. Commissariat, Neil Turok urges warning on BICEP2 effects (2014), http://​physicsworld. com/​cws/​article/​news/​2014/​mar/​18/​neil-turok-urges-caution-on-bicep2-results. Accessed 18 March 2014 fifty five. S. W. Hawking, R. Penrose, The singularities of gravitational cave in and cosmology. Proc. R. Soc. Londo. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 314 (1519) 529–548 (1970) Footnotes 1The discussion is determined among Saints Peter and Paul, with the latter featuring Weyl’s ‘apostatical’ and ‘heretical’ perspectives opposed to the ‘Relativity Church’. the subsequent assertion, which appears loosely quoted from the postcard despatched through Einstein, was once made by way of Peter. 2They don't nation this in phrases, however it is the that means in their mathematical formulae. [Eddington’s footnote]. 3Note that this change isn't really legitimate whilst , which we're in any case no longer drawn to. An similar transformation if so is located by way of environment , whence , and Eqs. (7. 21), (7. 24), and (7. 27), yield the line-element, . 4Note that the 2 identities, and , are invaluable right here. Eq. (7. 17), in addition to our eventual line-element, Eq. (7. 28), used to be initially stumbled on by means of Lemaître [41], even supposing his technique to Eq. (7. 14) (with dimensionality restored), is just too huge in its argument by means of an element of . 5Note that we don’t even have to unravel the fundamental in Eq. (7. 20), considering that simply partial derivatives of include wanted right here and under. 6Note that the ‘radially’ symmetric a part of Eq. (7. four) is already orthogonal to . � Springer overseas Publishing Switzerland 2015 Anthony Aguirre, Brendan Foster and Zeeya Merali (eds. )Questioning the principles of PhysicsThe Frontiers Collection10. 1007/978-3-319-13045-3_8 eight. now not on yet of Olaf Dreyer1   (1)Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza” and Sez. Roma1 INFN, P. le A. Moro 2, 00185 Rome, Italy Olaf Dreyer e mail: olaf. dreyer@gmail. com summary In physics we come upon debris in a single of 2 methods. both as primary elements of the speculation or as emergent excitations. those methods range through how the particle pertains to the history. It both sits at the history, or it really is an excitation of the history. We argue that by means of deciding on the previous to build our primary theories we have now made a high priced mistake.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.44 of 5 – based on 4 votes