By Paul J. Nahin

What does quilting need to do with electrical circuit conception? the answer's only one of the interesting ways in which best-selling well known math author Paul Nahin illustrates the deep interaction of math and physics on the earth round us in his most modern ebook of not easy mathematical puzzles, Mrs. Perkins's electrical Quilt. together with his trademark mix of interesting mathematical difficulties and the old anecdotes surrounding them, Nahin invitations readers on an exhilarating and informative exploration of a few of the various methods math and physics mix to create whatever greatly extra robust, worthy, and engaging than both is through itself.

In a sequence of short and mostly self-contained chapters, Nahin discusses a variety of themes during which math and physics are collectively established and collectively illuminating, from Newtonian gravity and Newton's legislation of mechanics to ballistics, air drag, and electrical energy. The mathematical topics variety from algebra, trigonometry, geometry, and calculus to differential equations, Fourier sequence, and theoretical and Monte Carlo likelihood. each one bankruptcy contains problems--some 3 dozen in all--that problem readers to aim their hand at utilising what they've got discovered. simply as in his different books of mathematical puzzles, Nahin discusses the historic heritage of every challenge, offers many examples, contains MATLAB codes, and offers whole and certain ideas on the end.

Mrs. Perkins's electrical Quilt will entice scholars attracted to new math and physics purposes, lecturers trying to find strange examples to exploit in class--and an individual who enjoys renowned math books.

Show description

Preview of Mrs. Perkins's Electric Quilt: And Other Intriguing Stories of Mathematical Physics PDF

Best Mathematics books

Symmetry: A Journey into the Patterns of Nature

Symmetry is throughout us. Our eyes and minds are attracted to symmetrical gadgets, from the pyramid to the pentagon. Of primary value to the way in which we interpret the realm, this specific, pervasive phenomenon shows a dynamic dating among items. In chemistry and physics, the idea that of symmetry explains the constitution of crystals or the idea of primary debris; in evolutionary biology, the flora and fauna exploits symmetry within the struggle for survival; and symmetry—and the breaking of it—is principal to principles in paintings, structure, and song.

Combining a wealthy ancient narrative together with his personal own trip as a mathematician, Marcus du Sautoy takes a special investigate the mathematical brain as he explores deep conjectures approximately symmetry and brings us face-to-face with the oddball mathematicians, either earlier and current, who've battled to appreciate symmetry's elusive traits. He explores what's might be the main interesting discovery to date—the summit of mathematicians' mastery within the field—the Monster, a tremendous snowflake that exists in 196,883-dimensional area with extra symmetries than there are atoms within the sunlight.

what's it wish to remedy an historic mathematical challenge in a flash of idea? what's it wish to be proven, ten mins later, that you've made a mistake? what's it wish to see the area in mathematical phrases, and what can that let us know approximately existence itself? In Symmetry, Marcus du Sautoy investigates those questions and exhibits mathematical newbies what it seems like to grapple with one of the most advanced principles the human brain can understand.

Do the Math: Secrets, Lies, and Algebra

Tess loves math simply because it is the one topic she will trust—there's regularly only one correct solution, and it by no means alterations. yet then she starts off algebra and is brought to these pesky and mysterious variables, which appear to be in every single place in 8th grade. while even your mates and fogeys could be variables, how on the planet do you discover out the perfect solutions to the quite vital questions, like what to do a few boy you're keen on or whom to inform whilst a persons' performed whatever relatively undesirable?

Advanced Engineering Mathematics (2nd Edition)

This transparent, pedagogically wealthy publication develops a robust knowing of the mathematical rules and practices that trendy engineers want to know. both as potent as both a textbook or reference guide, it ways mathematical ideas from an engineering standpoint, making actual functions extra bright and gigantic.

Category Theory for the Sciences (MIT Press)

Classification concept was once invented within the Nineteen Forties to unify and synthesize various parts in arithmetic, and it has confirmed remarkably profitable in allowing strong communique among disparate fields and subfields inside of arithmetic. This e-book exhibits that classification concept could be necessary outdoors of arithmetic as a rigorous, versatile, and coherent modeling language in the course of the sciences.

Extra resources for Mrs. Perkins's Electric Quilt: And Other Intriguing Stories of Mathematical Physics

Show sample text content

18). f (θ ) we find, back after a bit effortless algebra (that Then, if we calculate d dθ you might want to confirm) that 2kv02 cos2 (θ0 ) d f (θ ) =− , dθ mg cos3 (θ ) or − m v02 cos2 (θ0 ) dθ = d f (θ ). g cos3 (θ ) 2k hence, the firstly horrible-looking (9. 18) collapses to the splendidly effortless m S= 2k θ=0 θ=θ0 d f (θ ) m m (ln { f (θ )}) |θθ =0 [ln { f (0) − ln f (θ0 )}] , = =θ0 = f (θ ) 2k 2k BALLISTICS WITH AIR DRAG _ _ _ _ 131 or, as f (θ0 ) = 1 and so ln f (θ0 ) = zero, now we have kv 2 cos2 (θ0 ) m m ln { f (0)} = ln 1 − zero 2k 2k mg S= 1 sin(θ0 ) − sec(θ0 ) + tan(θ0 ) cos2 (θ0 ) . √ kv 2 m 1 ln 1 − zero ln √ −2 three 2k 4mg 2+ three . × ln on account that sec(60◦ ) = 2, √ tan(60◦ ) = three, √ sin(60◦ ) = 3/2, cos(60◦ ) = 0.5, then S= (9. 19) placing numbers into (9. 19) for our baseball (notice that m = mg/g), we now have the size of the ascending component of the ball’s trajectory as S= zero. 32 1. sixty three · 10−5 (146. 7)2 [ln(0. 268) − three. 464] , ln 1 − 2 · 32. 2 · 1. sixty three · 10−5 four · zero. 32 or S = 255. 2 ft. As a payment, a similar laptop code that I used prior gave a cost for S of 255 ft (and for the full trajectory, from begin to floor impression, the code gave a size of 490. nine feet). compared, while the code used to be run for a vacuum trajectory (k = 0), the worth of S was once declared to be the for much longer 399. 1 ft (and 798. three ft for the total trajectory size; this doubling is simply what we'd count on for the symmetrical vacuum trajectory). there are numerous, many extra such questions lets discover with computing device code, yet i feel this can be adequate on air drag. 7 So, I’ll cease the following and easily ask you to aim and picture what Johann Bernoulli could have given for a contemporary computer machine. 132 _ _ _ _ dialogue nine CP. P9. 1: Take the restrict okay → zero in (9. 19) and use the outcome to compute S for the vacuum trajectory. How good does the reply accept as true with the pc code’s estimate of 399. 1 ft? trace: keep in mind that ln(1 − x) ≈ −x as x → zero. Notes and References 1. you could learn extra approximately this conflict in a paper by way of Niccolò Guicciardini, “Johann Bernoulli, John Keill and the Inverse challenge of relevant Forces’’ (Annals of technology, November 1995, pp. 537–575). Keill and Bernoulli had fought even sooner than the critical strength debate; as Guicciardini writes, “Keill used to be probably the most unswerving and assiduous one of the defenders of Newton within the precedence dispute with Leibniz over the discovery of the calculus. Keill’s undesirable mood and offensive perspective poisoned the talk at a degree that embarrassed even Newton. ’’ Bernoulli was once a energetic supporter of Leibniz over Newton, a place that enraged the sycophantic Keill, who in 1708 had accused Leibniz of plagiarizing Newton’s calculus (a declare rejected via glossy historians of technology as absurd). For extra at the calculus debate and Keill’s function in it, see A. Rupert corridor, Philosophers at conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge collage Press, 1980). I should still inform you that now not all people has the same opinion with the biographical interpretation of my tale of Keill as opposed to Bernoulli. See, for instance, D. T. Whiteside, “The Mathematical ideas Underlying Newton’s Principia Mathematica’’ (Journal for the background of Astronomy 1, 1970, pp.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.42 of 5 – based on 45 votes